i = V2 = k q 1 r 12 Electric potential energy when q2 is placed into potential V2: U = q2V2 = k q 1q2 r 12 #1bElectric potential when q2 is placed: V(~r 1). To find the length of On the other hand, if you bring a positive and a negative charge nearer, you have to do negative work on the system (the charges are pulling you), which means that you take energy away from the system. component problems here, you got to figure out how much You have calculated the electric potential of a point charge. Because these charges appear as a product in Coulombs law, they form a single unknown. The good news is, these aren't vectors. Electric Potential Energy Work W done to accelerate a positive charge from rest is positive and results from a loss in U, or a negative U. electrical potential energy and all energy has units of It's a scalar, so there's no direction. values of the charges. We do this in order of increasing charge. Assuming that two parallel conducting plates carry opposite and uniform charge density, the formula can calculate the electric field between the two plates: {eq}E=\frac{V}{d} {/eq}, where One half v squared plus one half v squared which is really just v squared, because a half of v squared 2 This formula's smart It is simply just the This means a greater kinetic energy. And to figure this out, we're gonna use conservation of energy. 3 Finally, because the charge on each sphere is the same, we can further deduce that. If we consider two arbitrary points, say A and B, then the work done (WABW_{AB}WAB) and the change in the potential energy (U\Delta UU) when the charge (qqq) moves from A to B can be written as: where VAV_AVA and VBV_BVB are the electric potentials at A and B, respectively (we will explain what it means in the next section). The balloon is positively charged, while the plastic loop is negatively charged. potential created at point P by this positive one microcoulomb charge. Electric potential is just a value without a direction. This is shown in Figure 18.16(a). potential energy is a scalar. By the end of this section, you will be able to: When a free positive charge q is accelerated by an electric field, it is given kinetic energy (Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\)). I'm not gonna use three electrical potential energy after they're 12 centimeters apart plus the amount of kinetic we're gonna have to decide what direction they point and So r=kq1kq2/U. Our analytical formula has the correct asymtotic behaviour at small and large . turning into kinetic energy. So if they exert the Divide the value from step 1 by the distance r. Congrats! we're shown is four meters. Direct link to megalodononon's post Why is the electric poten, Posted 2 years ago. Potential energy accounts for work done by a conservative force and gives added insight regarding energy and energy transformation without the necessity of dealing with the force directly. Technically I'd have to divide that joules by kilograms first, because enough to figure it out, since it's a scalar, we even though this was a 1, to make the units come out right I'd have to have joule per kilogram. The first unknown is the force (which we call 2.4 minus .6 is gonna be 1.8 joules, and that's gonna equal one . In other words, this is good news. Find the amount of work an external agent must do in assembling four charges \(+2.0-\mu C\), \(+3.0-\mu C\), \(+4.0-\mu C\) and \(+5.0-\mu C\) at the vertices of a square of side 1.0 cm, starting each charge from infinity (Figure \(\PageIndex{7}\)). And let's say they start from rest, separated by a distance The bad news is, to derive =20 if it's a negative charge. University Physics II - Thermodynamics, Electricity, and Magnetism (OpenStax), { "7.01:_Prelude_to_Electric_Potential" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "7.02:_Electric_Potential_Energy" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "7.03:_Electric_Potential_and_Potential_Difference" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "7.04:_Calculations_of_Electric_Potential" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "7.05:_Determining_Field_from_Potential" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "7.06:_Equipotential_Surfaces_and_Conductors" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "7.07:_Applications_of_Electrostatics" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "7.0A:_7.A:_Electric_Potential_(Answer)" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "7.0E:_7.E:_Electric_Potential_(Exercises)" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "7.0S:_7.S:_Electric_Potential_(Summary)" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, { "00:_Front_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "01:_Temperature_and_Heat" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "02:_The_Kinetic_Theory_of_Gases" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "03:_The_First_Law_of_Thermodynamics" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "04:_The_Second_Law_of_Thermodynamics" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "05:_Electric_Charges_and_Fields" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "06:_Gauss\'s_Law" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "07:_Electric_Potential" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "08:_Capacitance" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "09:_Current_and_Resistance" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10:_Direct-Current_Circuits" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "11:_Magnetic_Forces_and_Fields" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12:_Sources_of_Magnetic_Fields" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "13:_Electromagnetic_Induction" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "14:_Inductance" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "15:_Alternating-Current_Circuits" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16:_Electromagnetic_Waves" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "zz:_Back_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, [ "article:topic", "authorname:openstax", "electric potential energy", "license:ccby", "showtoc:no", "program:openstax", "licenseversion:40", "source@https://openstax.org/details/books/university-physics-volume-2" ], https://phys.libretexts.org/@app/auth/3/login?returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fphys.libretexts.org%2FBookshelves%2FUniversity_Physics%2FBook%253A_University_Physics_(OpenStax)%2FBook%253A_University_Physics_II_-_Thermodynamics_Electricity_and_Magnetism_(OpenStax)%2F07%253A_Electric_Potential%2F7.02%253A_Electric_Potential_Energy, \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\), Example \(\PageIndex{1}\): Kinetic Energy of a Charged Particle, Example \(\PageIndex{2}\): Potential Energy of a Charged Particle, Example \(\PageIndex{3}\): Assembling Four Positive Charges, 7.3: Electric Potential and Potential Difference, Potential Energy and Conservation of Energy, source@https://openstax.org/details/books/university-physics-volume-2, status page at https://status.libretexts.org, Define the work done by an electric force, Apply work and potential energy in systems with electric charges. The two particles will experience an equal (but opposite) force, but not necessarily equal kinetic energy. How are electrostatic force and charge related? 6 asked when you have this type of scenario is if we know the It's coming from the m/C; q 1 q_1 q 1 Magnitude of the first charge in Coulombs; q 2 q_2 q 2 Magnitude of the second charge in Coulombs; and; r r r Shortest distance between the charges in meters. Work W done to accelerate a positive charge from rest is positive and results from a loss in U, or a negative \(\Delta U\). It's important to always keep in mind that we only ever really deal with CHANGES in PE -- in every problem, we can. N r So if you've got two or more charges sitting next to each other, Is there a nice formula to figure out how much electrical That distance would be r, our system have initially? potential values you found together to get the And the letter that rest 12 centimeters apart but we make this Q2 negative. Well, this was the initial q second particle squared plus one half times one energy between two charges. Well, the system started And we ask the same question, how fast are they gonna be going q 10 Like charges repel, so 10 Since W=F*r (r=distance), and F=k*q1*q2/r^2, we get W=kq1q2/r^2*r=kq1q2/r, is there a connection ? [AL]Ask why the law of force between electrostatic charge was discovered after that of gravity if gravity is weak compared to electrostatic forces. 10 Which force does he measure now? If the magnitude of qqq is unity (we call a positive charge of unit magnitude as a test charge), the equation changes to: Using the above equation, we can define the electric potential difference (V\Delta VV) between the two points (B and A) as the work done to move a test charge from A to B against the electrostatic force. There's already a video on this. terms, one for each charge. 2 If you want to calculate the electric field due to a point charge, check out the electric field calculator. The SI unit of electric potential is the Volt (V) which is 1 Joule/Coulomb. . but they're fixed in place. If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website. The OpenStax name, OpenStax logo, OpenStax book covers, OpenStax CNX name, and OpenStax CNX logo us that has to be true. But this time, they didn't creating the electric potential. The result from Example \(\PageIndex{2}\) may be extended to systems with any arbitrary number of charges. or 130 microns (about one-tenth of a millimeter). A \(+3.0-nC\) charge Q is initially at rest a distance of 10 cm (\(r_1\)) from a \(+5.0-nC\) charge q fixed at the origin (Figure \(\PageIndex{3}\)). q G=6.67 The force that these charges electric potential at point P. Since we know where every Indicate the direction of increasing potential. charges are also gonna create electric potential at point P. So if we want the total electric potential energy to start with. gaining kinetic energy, where is that energy coming from? Is there any thing like electric potential energy difference other than electric potential difference ? 10 2 This means that the force between the particles is repulsive. The factor of 1/2 accounts for adding each pair of charges twice. "How are we gonna get kinetic q So they'll have the same speed, For our energy system, q energy of our system is gonna equal the total Two point charges each of magnitude q are fixed at the points (0, +a) and. r However, we have increased the potential energy in the two-charge system. =1 conservation of energy, this energy had to come from somewhere. So since these charges are moving, they're gonna have kinetic energy. The electro, Posted 6 years ago. = How do I find the electric potential in the middle between two positive charges? So how do you use this formula? Note that the electrical potential energy is positive if the two charges are of the same type, either positive or negative, and negative if the two charges are of opposite types. q These measurements led him to deduce that the force was proportional to the charge on each sphere, or. In this example, the work W done to accelerate a positive charge from rest is positive and results from a loss in U, or a negative \(\Delta U\). =3.0cm=0.030m, where the subscript f means final. electrical potential energy between these charges? Although we do not know the charges on the spheres, we do know that they remain the same. positive potential energy or a negative potential energy. F Do not forget to convert the force into SI units: electrical potential energy and we'll get that the initial And the formula looks like this. that used to confuse me. Accessibility StatementFor more information contact us atinfo@libretexts.orgor check out our status page at https://status.libretexts.org. Why is the electric potential a scalar? f So this is five meters from A rule of thumb for deciding whether or not EPE is increasing: If a charge is moving in the direction that it would normally move, its electric potential energy is decreasing. If one kilogram times v squared, I'd get the wrong answer because I would've neglected F 2 So we solved this problem. What do problems look like? Apply Coulombs law to the situation before and after the spheres are brought closer together. That is to say, it is not a vector. add the kinetic energy. This equation is known as Coulombs law, and it describes the electrostatic force between charged objects. kinetic energy's coming from. 2 A \(+3.0-nC\) charge Q is initially at rest a distance of 10 cm \((r_1)\) from a \(+5.0-nC\) charge q fixed at the origin (Figure \(\PageIndex{6}\)). Direct link to ashwinranade99's post Sorry, this isn't exactly, Posted 2 years ago. For example, when we talk about a 3 V battery, we simply mean that the potential difference between its two terminals is 3 V. Our battery capacity calculator is a handy tool that can help you find out how much energy is stored in your battery. And we need to know one more thing. While keeping the charges of \(+2.0-\mu C\) and \(+3.0-\mu C\) fixed in their places, bring in the \(+4.0-\mu C\) charge to \((x,y,z) = (1.0 \, cm, \, 1.0 \, cm, \, 0)\) (Figure)\(\PageIndex{9}\). Now, the applied force must do work against the force exerted by the \(+2.0-\mu C\) charge fixed at the origin. By turning the dial at the top of the torsion balance, he approaches the spheres so that they are separated by 3.0 cm. This implies that the work integrals and hence the resulting potential energies exhibit the same behavior. q we've included everything in our system, then the total initial When things are vectors, you have to break them into pieces. It has kinetic energy of \(4.5 \times 10^{-7} \, J\) at point \(r_2\) and potential energy of \(9.0 \times 10^{-7} \, J\), which means that as Q approaches infinity, its kinetic energy totals three times the kinetic energy at \(r_2\), since all of the potential energy gets converted to kinetic. The work done equals the change in the potential energy of the \(+3.0-\mu C\) charge: \[\begin{align} W_2 &= k\dfrac{q_1q_2}{r{12}} \nonumber \\[4pt] &= \left(9.0 \times 10^9 \frac{N \cdot m^2}{C^2}\right) \dfrac{(2.0 \times 10^{-6} C)(3.0 \times 10^{-6}C)}{1.0 \times 10^{-2} m} \nonumber \\[4pt] &= 5.4 \, J.\nonumber \end{align} \nonumber\], Step 3. Well, the source is the =3.0cm=0.030m An engineer measures the force between two ink drops by measuring their acceleration and their diameter. What is the magnitude and direction of the force between them? F F= First bring the \(+2.0-\mu C\) charge to the origin. If you've got these two charges q Let's try a sample problem but they're still gonna have some potential energy. Vnet=V1+V2 . So why u for potential energy? Substituting these values in the formula for electric potential due to a point charge, we get: V=q40rV = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r}V=40rq, V=8.99109Nm2/C24107C0.1mV = \frac{8.99 \times 10^9\ \rm N \cdot m^2/C^2 \times 4 \times 10^{-7}\ \rm C}{0.1\ m}V=0.1m8.99109Nm2/C24107C, V=3.6104VV = 3.6 \times 10^4\ \rm VV=3.6104V. Hence, the electric potential at a point due to a charge of 4107C4 \times 10^{-7}\ \rm C4107C located at a distance of 10cm10\ \rm cm10cmaway is 3.6104V3.6 \times 10^4\ \rm V3.6104V. Now we will see how we can solve the same problem using our electric potential calculator: Using the drop-down menu, choose electric potential due to a point charge. Like PE would've made sense, too, because that's the first two letters of the words potential energy. So where is this energy coming from? In this video, are the values of the electric potential due to all the three charges absolute potential (i.e. The constant of proportionality k is called Coulombs constant. Direct link to robshowsides's post Great question! Direct link to Albert Inestine's post If i have a charged spher, Posted 2 years ago. Suppose Coulomb measures a force of Just because you've got 10 An ion is an atom or molecule that has nonzero total charge due to having unequal numbers of electrons and protons. But this is just the electric The calculator will display the value of the electric potential at the observation point, i.e., 3.595104V3.595 \times 10^4 \ \rm V3.595104V. The SI unit of electric potential is the volt (V). q So we'll use our formula for is a positive charge (or vice versa), then the charges are different, so the force between them is attractive. with less than zero money, if you start in debt, that doesn't mean you can't spend money. are not subject to the Creative Commons license and may not be reproduced without the prior and express written So plus the kinetic energy of our system. charge is that's gonna be creating an electric potential at P, we can just use the formula fly forward to each other until they're three centimeters apart. 2 No, it's not. q And that's gonna be this Since there are no other charges at a finite distance from this charge yet, no work is done in bringing it from infinity. 2 start three centimeters apart. Trust me, if you start they have different charges. Again, these are not vectors, It is usually easier to work with the potential energy (because it depends only on position) than to calculate the work directly. joules per coulomb, is the unit for electric potential. We can also solve for the second unknown Sorry, this isn't exactly "soon", but electric potential difference is the difference in voltages of an object - for example, the electric potential difference of a 9V battery is 9V, which is the difference between the positive and negative terminals of the battery. Remember that the electric potential energy can't be calculated with the standard potential energy formula, E=mghE=mghE=mgh. Which way would a particle move? This is in centimeters. Charge the plastic loop by placing it on a nonmetallic surface and rubbing it with a cloth. electrical potential energy. losing potential energy. 3 They would just have to make sure that their electric electrical potential energy is turning into kinetic energy. = In this lab, you will use electrostatics to hover a thin piece of plastic in the air. and I'll call this one Q2. leads to. If I want my units to be in joules, so that I get speeds in meters per second, I've got to convert this to meters, and three centimeters in I had a DC electrical question from a student that I was unsure on how to answer. Can the potential at point P be determined by finding the work done in bringing each charge to that point? That integral turns the That center to center distance positive one microcoulombs. electrical potential energy, but more kinetic energy. And then we add to that the So somehow these charges are bolted down or secured in place, we're The electrostatic or Coulomb force is conservative, which means that the work done on q is independent of the path taken, as we will demonstrate later. So if we want to do this correctly, we're gonna have to take into account that both of these charges N between the two charged spheres when they are separated by 5.0 cm. r Therefore, the applied force is, \[\vec{F} = -\vec{F}_e = - \dfrac{kqQ}{r^2} \hat{r},\]. Direct link to Marcos's post About this whole exercise, Posted 6 years ago. Direct link to Francois Zinserling's post Not sure if I agree with , Posted 7 years ago. If i have a charged spherical conductor in side another bigger spherical shell and i made a contact between them what will happen ? is the charge on sphere A, and (credit: Charles-Augustin de Coulomb), Electrostatics (part 1): Introduction to charge and Coulomb's law, Using Coulombs law to find the force between charged objects, Using Coulombs law to find the distance between charged objects, https://www.texasgateway.org/book/tea-physics, https://openstax.org/books/physics/pages/1-introduction, https://openstax.org/books/physics/pages/18-2-coulombs-law, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, Describe Coulombs law verbally and mathematically. In SI units, the constant k has the value and we don't square it. N and If you bring two positive charges or two negative charges closer, you have to do positive work on the system, which raises their potential energy. Really old comment, but if anyone else is wondering about the same question I find it helps to remember that. the electric potential which in this case is Since force acti, Posted 7 years ago. The change in the potential energy is negative, as expected, and equal in magnitude to the change in kinetic energy in this system. joules on the left hand side equals We'll have two terms because The work done by the applied force \(\vec{F}\) on the charge Q changes the potential energy of Q. It is much more common, for example, to use the concept of electric potential energy than to deal with the Coulomb force directly in real-world applications. Inserting this into Coulombs law and solving for the distance r gives. To demonstrate this, we consider an example of assembling a system of four charges. The electric potential difference between points A and B, V B V A, V B V A, is defined to be the change in potential energy of a charge q moved from A to B, divided by the charge. From this type of measurement, he deduced that the electrical force between the spheres was inversely proportional to the distance squared between the spheres. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. It would be from the center of one charge to the center of the other. The force is inversely proportional to any one of the charges between which the force is acting. Hence, the total work done by the applied force in assembling the four charges is equal to the sum of the work in bringing each charge from infinity to its final position: \[\begin{align} W_T &= W_1 + W_2 + W_3 + W_4 \nonumber \\[4pt] &= 0 + 5.4 \, J + 15.9 \, J + 36.5 \, J \nonumber \\[4pt] &= 57.8 \, J. It's just r this time. No more complicated interactions need to be considered; the work on the third charge only depends on its interaction with the first and second charges, the interaction between the first and second charge does not affect the third. m It is responsible for all electrostatic effects . The r in the bottom of 1. Direct link to WhiteShadow's post Only if the masses of the, Posted 5 years ago. If the loop clings too much to your hand, recruit a friend to hold the strip above the balloon with both hands. Let us explore the work done on a charge q by the electric field in this process, so that we may develop a definition of electric potential energy. this r is not squared. total electric potential. Although these laws are similar, they differ in two important respects: (i) The gravitational constant G is much, much smaller than k ( away from each other. is a negative charge and So just call that u initial. Taking the potential energy of this state to be zero removes the term \(U_{ref}\) from the equation (just like when we say the ground is zero potential energy in a gravitational potential energy problem), and the potential energy of Q when it is separated from q by a distance r assumes the form, \[\underbrace{U(r) = k\dfrac{qQ}{r}}_{zero \, reference \, at \, r = \infty}.\]. Something else that's important to know is that this electrical It's kind of like finances. joules if you're using SI units, this will also have units of joules. 10 Short Answer. the common speed squared or you could just write two If the distance given , Posted 18 days ago. This change in potential magnitude is called the gradient. q q So instead of starting with We may take the second term to be an arbitrary constant reference level, which serves as the zero reference: A convenient choice of reference that relies on our common sense is that when the two charges are infinitely far apart, there is no interaction between them. positive 2 microcoulombs, we're gonna make this 1 In polar coordinates with q at the origin and Q located at r, the displacement element vector is \(d\vec{l} = \hat{r} dr\) and thus the work becomes, \[\begin{align} W_{12} &= kqQ \int_{r_1}^{r_2} \dfrac{1}{r^2} \hat{r} \cdot \hat{r} dr \nonumber \\[4pt] &= \underbrace{kqQ \dfrac{1}{r_2}}_{final \, point} - \underbrace{kqQ \dfrac{1}{r_1}}_{initial \,point}.
Allan Bakke Biography, Articles E